An important Supreme Court decision for the dental field

نویسنده

  • Won Lee
چکیده

Many oral and maxillofacial surgeons discussed and provided supplementary materials in the Social Networking Service. After the Supreme Court hearings, supplementary data was requested by the court, and many oral and maxillofacial surgeons submitted data. This yielded an excellent outcome. The efforts of the oral and maxillofacial surgeon were undoubtedly get praised in this trial. Because this judgment will become case law, the decision of the Supreme Court is very important. When there are similar cases in the future, this case can be used as a reference for the legitimacy of facial region treatment by dentists. The barrier to treatment of the facial area by dentists no longer exists. However, they should have a responsibility on their treatment for facial areas. By virtue of this verdict, treatment of facial areas by dentists will become more popular, but, at the same time, side effects of these treatments may be increased. It will put fetters on dentists in the future. Therefore , education and self-surveillance should be maintained in the dental field. In addition, the Korean Dental Association including, the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, should encourage efforts to increase the education of general practitioners and to establish standards of facial treatment in the future. These efforts should help preserve the dental field and dentists' pride obtained from this judgment. We appreciate the Supreme Court, which handed down this wise decision. Also, we would like to thank the many dentists who have done their best to keep the dental fields from medical doctor. was a very important day for Korean dentists. Botulinum toxin (BTX) was used for the treatment of wrinkles around the eyes and forehead by a dentist on October 7, 2011, who was later charged with administering medical care without the appropriate license. The dentist was convicted of medical law violations in both the first and second trial. The case was then appealed to the Supreme Court and deliberated en banc. The accused was ruled innocent and the case was sent back to the second trial court. Although there were a few dissenting opinions within the Supreme Court, the use of BTX injections for wrinkles around the eyes and forehead by dentists was legitimized. The dental community did not have high hopes regarding the Supreme Court appeal in this case because the dentist had been found guilty in the first and second trials, in which case the probability …

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Competent Authorities to Handle Complaints about Incorrect Tax Assessment and Collection with an Ethical Approach in Iran

Background: Retrial is an additional combination of the words "retrial" and "trial". Trial is a means of justice and trial, like others, is in the introduction of error and error if there is a verdict that is accompanied by error as a result of the trial. Which must be reconsidered. In the relations between taxpayers and the tax system, a dispute is possible, which can be due to factors such as...

متن کامل

Cognitive Mapping of the Human Capital of the Auditors of Supreme Audit Court

The present study was conducted with the aim of analyzing the components of human capital and discovering the relationships between them for the auditors of the Supreme Audit Court. Thus, after identifying the dimensions of human capital at the individual level, the components of human capital for the auditors of the Supreme Audit Court were extracted using content analysis of semi-structured i...

متن کامل

Perspectives on affirmative action in academic dental institutions: the U.S. Supreme Court rulings in the University of Michigan cases.

In June 2003 the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of using race as a factor in higher education admissions decisions. This article considers the impact of the Supreme Court decisions on admissions procedures at selected academic dental institutions (ADI) and their parent institutions. We interviewed fifty-eight leaders considered to be individual stakeholders at seven ADI and the...

متن کامل

Oregon Supreme Court Ruling Prohibits Hospital from Refusing a Sell Order.

In a recent decision involving a capital murder case, Oregon State Hospital v. Butts, the Oregon Supreme Court conducted a mandamus hearing to ascertain whether Oregon State Hospital (OSH) had a legal duty to comply with a Sell order from a county trial court to provide antipsychotic medications to an incompetent defendant, despite its belief, as an institution, that medication was not clinical...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 42  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016